Friday, October 14, 2011

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Gay Adoption Case

The Supreme court denied a request to hear an appeal in the case of two gay dads who are suing the sate of Louisiana over its refusal to include the names of both fathers on their adopted son's revised birth certificate.  The Washington Blade reports:

The court denied the petition for a writ of certiorari, which was filed by Lambda Legal, in the case of Adar v. Smith. Justices didn’t offer a comment on why they wouldn’t hear the lawsuit, which effectively ended the path for the litigation.
Kenneth Upton, supervising senior staff attorney in Lambda’s south central regional office in Dallas, said the Supreme Court is “leaving untouched a dangerous” previously issued ruling that leaves same-sex parents who have adopted or plan to adopt “treated differently from state to state.”
“By denying this writ, the Supreme Court is leaving untouched a dangerous Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that carves out an exception to the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution and to the uniformly recognized respect for judgments that states have come to rely upon,” Upton said. “This decision leaves adopted children and their parents vulnerable in their interactions with officials from other states.”
The case involves Oren Adar and Mickey Smith, a gay couple who in 2006 adopted their Louisiana-born son in New York, where a judge issued an adoption decree. In 2007, the couple attempted to obtain a new birth certificate for their child in part so Smith could extend his health insurance coverage to his son.
However, State Registrar Darlene Smith wouldn’t issue a certificate with both adopted parents’ names, saying Louisiana doesn’t recognize adoption by unmarried parents.
In October 2007, Lambda filed a lawsuit on the basis that the registrar was violating the U.S. Constitution’s Full Faith and Credit Clause and Equal Protection Clause. Lambda argued that under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, judgments issued by a court in one state, such as New York, must be legally binding in other states, such as Louisiana.
Read the full story here.

Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta


  1. Thats good and i stand with Louisiana on this one against fags and queers.

  2. Gee, I didn't know that fags and queers were two different things. Thanks for clearing that up, dumb-ass. Fortunately for the rest of us, idiots like you are a dying breed.


Please keep comments relevant and civil. Comments attacking other people will be deleted.

Subscribe in a reader